Social media is already a primary attack surface for cybercriminals, and this exposure is expected to grow further in 2026. On these platforms, attackers rely less on software exploits and more on psychological manipulation. More than 86 percent of cyber threats on social media rely on social engineering to trick users into unsafe actions, often making attacks feel authentic and personal. 

This article explains how hackers could weaponise social media in 2026, what risks organisations and individuals face, and what security teams should consider now to prepare.

The Social Media Threat Landscape in 2026

Social media platforms are embedded in everyday life. Billions of people share personal updates, opinions, and sensitive information across networks. This creates a large pool of data that threat actors can use to craft credible attacks.

Social engineering techniques exploit human psychology rather than technical vulnerabilities. They take advantage of trust, curiosity, urgency, authority cues, and social proof. In the context of social media, these tactics are amplified because people are conditioned to respond to notifications, friend requests, direct messages, and engagement prompts.

Research shows that attackers are increasingly using social platforms as part of their campaigns, with some reports indicating that nearly 44 percent of organisations have experienced social engineering attacks initiated via social networks.

Different attack types now cluster around social platforms.

Source: Verizon DBIR 2025; Proofpoint Social Engineering Report 2025; Trend Micro Threat Research

Real‑World Examples of Social Media Abuse

Real incidents reinforce why social media security should be treated as a core risk surface, not a peripheral concern.

Account Hijacking and Extortion Attempts

In late 2025, attackers hijacked a public Instagram account after convincing a user to share a one‑time password under the pretext of a job offer. Once they had control, they used the compromised identity to contact other users and attempt extortion of a well‑known public figure. While this incident did not result in a large‑scale breach, it highlighted how quickly trust on social platforms can be abused and how rapidly a compromise can be weaponised for further social manipulation.

Malware Delivery via Professional Networking

Security researchers have documented campaigns where attackers used LinkedIn messaging to distribute malicious files. In one case, a seemingly legitimate file sent over LinkedIn sideloaded a Remote Access Trojan (RAT) through DLL hijacking. Because the interaction occurred on a trusted platform and through direct messages, the malware evaded many traditional email‑centric defences and gained traction with targets who assumed the communication was safe.

Long‑Running Disinformation and Credential Harvesting Campaigns

 Operation Newscaster was a sustained campaign in which threat actors developed elaborate fake social media personas on platforms including Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, and YouTube. These personas were used to befriend targets, gather personal details, and eventually launch phishing campaigns that stole credentials and established initial access for broader espionage activity. This campaign shows how social platforms enable credential theft and large-scale social engineering.

These real incidents have common threads: attackers leverage the trust and context inherent in social platforms to bypass both human and technical defences.

AI and Social Media Manipulation

Artificial intelligence is changing the threat landscape. Generative AI can produce convincing text, images, video, and voice clips that mimic real users. This technology allows attackers to create highly personalised social media content at scale.

Deepfake content illustrates this shift. They can be used to manipulate employees into taking unsafe actions, such as authorising transfers, disclosing credentials, or altering account permissions.

Recent industry research shows that AI-powered identity fraud and deepfake-enabled schemes expanded significantly in 2025, with sophisticated attempts increasing sharply as attackers adopt generative AI tools. As the technology becomes more accessible, barriers to entry for attackers drop. Even less-skilled actors can run convincing impersonation attacks.

In addition to deepfakes, generative AI can craft malicious social engineering messages that blend real details with fabricated context. For example, attackers might use stolen personal data to tailor a fake support message that appears to originate from a service the victim actually uses. This increases the likelihood that the recipient will engage, clicking on malicious links or downloading harmful files.

Common Attack Patterns

Understanding how attacks play out on social media helps security teams prepare defensively. Key patterns expected to persist in 2026 include:

1. Profile Impersonation and Brand Spoofing

Attackers create fake profiles used to post malicious links, send direct messages, and deceive followers into trusting harmful content. Social network users often assume that verified or familiar profiles are safe, making these tactics effective. Fake employee profiles can be used to connect with real employees for social reconnaissance and pretexting.

2. Fake Customer Support and Scam Pages

Fraudsters set up seemingly legitimate support accounts or pages that offer help or promotions. Users who interact with these accounts can be redirected to phishing sites or asked to provide personal information under false pretences.

3. Comment and Direct Message Attacks

Cybercriminals often embed malicious links in comments on trending posts or in private messages. These links may deliver malware, capture credentials, or lead to fraudulent applications that request elevated access.

4. AI‑Enhanced Social Engineering

AI allows attackers to automate personalised messaging. Messages can be tailored to an individual’s network activity, recent interactions, and personal interests, making them appear authentic and reducing suspicion. This increases click rates and reduces detection by traditional security tools.

5. Community Hijacking and Hashtag Abuse

Large communities built around hashtags or trending topics can be manipulated to amplify malicious content. Attackers might post harmful links using popular hashtags so that unsuspecting users encounter threats in feeds.

Implications for Organisations and Users

Weaponised social media introduces risk for both individuals and organisations. On the individual level, victims can suffer identity theft, financial loss, or compromised personal accounts. On the organisational level, social media exploitation can lead to reputational damage, credential theft, internal account takeover, and fraudulent transactions. 

A compromised high-profile account can have cascading effects. A single malicious post or message can reach thousands of users within minutes and quickly expand exposure.

What Security Teams Should Consider

The threat landscape requires a defence approach that integrates technology, awareness, and policy. Here are key considerations for 2026:

1. Enhance Social Media Monitoring

Security teams should expand monitoring beyond traditional attack vectors into social channels that relate to the organisation. Tools that analyse patterns and flag unusual account behaviour help surface threats early.

2. Strengthen Identity and Access Controls

Multi‑Factor Authentication (MFA) and centralised credential management reduce the risk of account takeover.

3. Improve Staff Awareness Training

Regular training on recognising manipulated content, phishing tactics, and account compromise indicators equips users to resist deception. Simulation exercises that include social media scenarios help build real‑world skills.

4. Adopt AI‑Driven Detection Tools

Signature‑based tools are limited in identifying novel, AI‑generated threats. Machine learning systems that analyse behaviour patterns, content anomalies, and account reputation help spot deception at scale.

5. Develop Incident Response Playbooks for Social Platforms

Organisations need defined procedures for responding to social media compromises. Clear escalation paths, communication guidelines, and account recovery steps reduce response time and limit damage.

Conclusion

Social media weaponisation reflects a broader shift in attacker behaviour. Instead of focusing only on technical vulnerabilities, attackers increasingly exploit trust, behaviour, and publicly available information. AI makes these tactics faster and easier to scale.

For organisations, this means social platforms should be treated as part of the core risk surface, not a peripheral channel. Strong identity controls, monitoring, and user awareness are now baseline requirements. Teams that account for social media risk in their security strategy will be better positioned to detect threats early and limit their impact.

At Cyberkach, we publish analysis on cybersecurity and emerging risks, with a focus on practical implications. Subscribe to the Cyberkach blog to stay informed as new analyses and reports are released, and join our newsletter for regular updates delivered to your inbox.